Take the belief or influence out of a process and you have an attribute of the rule.
Reality written individual an motivation to others is 40 week 40 hours Jones’s
Category: wait what
-
content1-flow.css
@namespace ibooks “http://www.plainwareblog.com/”;
html body
{
-ibooks-gutter-margin-left: 0.0pt;
-ibooks-gutter-margin-right: 0.0pt;
-ibooks-head-height: 560.0pt;
margin: 20.0pt 50.0pt 20.0pt 50.0pt;
}@page head
{
::slot(textShape-482)
{
height: 520.000pt;
left: 20.000pt;
top: 20.000pt;
width: 728.000pt;
z-index: 1;
}
::slot(textShape-483)
{
height: 409.000pt;
left: 30.000pt;
top: 244.000pt;
width: 416.000pt;
z-index: 2;
}
::slot(textShape-484)
{
height: 130.000pt;
left: 30.000pt;
top: 143.000pt;
width: 416.000pt;
z-index: 3;
}
::slot(image-39)
{
-ibooks-box-wrap-exterior-path: directional contour both 12.0pt 0.500000 false;
height: 57.505pt;
left: 28.000pt;
top: 46.000pt;
width: 302.000pt;
z-index: 4;
}
-ibooks-positioned-slots: textShape-482, textShape-483, textShape-484, image-39;
}
-
DocumentNLEThougEblog
/* Conversion Config */
$s.currencyCode = “USD”
/* Link Tracking Config */
$s.trackDownloadLinks = true
$s.trackExternalLinks = true
$s.trackInlineStats = true
$s.linkDownloadFileTypes = “exe,zip,wav,mp3,mov,mpg,avi,wmv,pdf,doc,docx,xls,xlsx,ppt,pptx”
$s.linkInternalFilters = “javascript:,.fanatics.com,.footballfanatics.com,localhost,127.0.0.1,www.paypal.com”;
$s.linkLeaveQueryString = false
$s.linkTrackVars = “None”
$s.linkTrackEvents = “None”
/* WARNING: Changing any of the below variables will cause drastic
changes to how your visitor data is collected. Changes should only be
made when instructed to do so by your account manager.*/
$s.visitorNamespace = “fanatics”
$s.trackingServer = “fanatics.112.2o7.net”
$s.dc = “112”;
// Setup User Agent and Hostname
$s.eVar52 = $s.prop52 = navigator.userAgent;
$s.eVar54 = $s.prop54 = document.location.hostname
// The referrer of the tracking call is the current page URL.
$s.prop50 = $s.eVar50 = “D=Referer”; // “Referer” with one r is the correct spelling of this header.
// The “r” parameter in the tracking call is the referring URL.
$s.prop51 = $s.eVar51 = “D=r”;
//Setup Clickmap
function s_getObjectID(o) {
var ID = o.href;
return ID;
}
$s.getObjectID = s_getObjectID;
/* Configure Channel Manager */
$s._channelParameter = “Paid Search|pcrid”;
$s._channelPattern=”email|EML”;
/* Plugin Config */
$s.usePlugins = true
function s_doPlugins(fanatics_s_code) {
// Page view call actions
if (!$s.linkType){
// Add event30 (custom page view event) to s.events for all page view calls
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, ‘event30’, ‘,’, 2);
}
//set current domain in linkInternalFilters
$s.getLinkInternalDomain();
// Put pageName in prop22 & eVar43 for correlation to other variables, especially in link tracking calls, which do not record pageName
if (!!$s.pageName)
$s.prop22 = $s.eVar43 = $s.pageName;
// Add calls to plugins here
// Copy search term and set aggregate search event
if ($s.prop4) {
$s.eVar1 = $s.prop4;
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, ‘event1’, ‘,’, 2);
}
// Copy search type prop into eVar
if ($s.prop7) {
$s.eVar2 = $s.prop7;
}
// automate event27 (more than 3000 search results)
if ($s.prop5 && parseInt($s.prop5) > 3000)
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, “event27”, “,”, 2);
// Do not refire search events if the same search term passed in twice in a row
var t_search = $s.getValOnce($s.eVar1, ‘s_stv’, 0);
if (t_search == ”) {
var a = $s.split($s.events, ‘,’);
var e = ”;
for (var i = 0; i < a.length; i++) {
if (a[i] == ‘event1’ || a[i] == ‘event2’ || a[i] == ‘event3’ || a[i] == ‘event4’)
continue;
else
e += a[i] ? a[i] + ‘,’ : a[i];
}
$s.events = e.substring(0, e.length – 1);
}
//Get Page Prior to Search
var s_prevPage = $s.getPreviousValue($s.pageName, ‘s_prevPage’, 0);
if ($s.prop4 && s_prevPage) {
$s.prop8 = s_prevPage;
}
else if ($s.prop4) {
$s.prop8 = “non-internal referrer to search results”;
}
//Get PageType Prior to Search
var s_prevPageType = $s.getPreviousValue($s.prop3, ‘s_prevProp3’, 0);
if ($s.prop4 && s_prevPageType) {
$s.prop10 = s_prevPageType;
}
else if ($s.prop4) {
$s.prop10 = “non-internal referrer to search results”;
}
// Automate Custom ProdView Event
if ($s.events && $s.events.indexOf(‘prodView’) > -1)
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, ‘event5’, ‘,’, 2);
// Automate Finding Method eVar
var internalFlag = false;
if (document.referrer) {
var filters = $s.split($s.linkInternalFilters, ‘,’);
var docRef = $s.split(document.referrer, ‘/’);
docRef = docRef[2];
for (var f in filters) {
if (docRef.indexOf(filters[f]) > -1)
internalFlag = true;
}
}
// create productmerch product for merchandising eVar binding
if ($s.eVar6 && (!$s.products || ($s.products && $s.products.indexOf(‘;productmerch’) > -1) || $s.newProduct == ‘true’))
{
if (!$s.c_r(‘productnum’))
$s.productNum = 1;
else
$s.productNum = parseInt($s.c_r(‘productnum’)) + 1;
$s.products = ‘;productmerch’ + $s.productNum; //record an instance with orig allocation – must bind to brand new product every time
var e = new Date();
e.setTime(e.getTime() + (30 * 86400000));
$s.c_w(‘productnum’, $s.productNum, e);
if ($s.linkTrackVars == “None” || $s.linkTrackVars == ”)
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘events,products’;
else
$s.linkTrackVars = $s.apl($s.linkTrackVars, ‘events,products’, ‘,’, 2);
if ($s.linkTrackEvents == “None” || $s.linkTrackEvents == ”){
$s.linkTrackEvents = $s.events = ‘event15’;
} else {
$s.linkTrackEvents = $s.apl($s.linkTrackEvents, ‘event15’, ‘,’, 2);
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, ‘event15’, ‘,’, 2);
}
}
if($s.products)
{
$s.events = $s.apl($s.events, ‘event15’, ‘,’, 2);
}
if ($s.c_r(‘productnum’) && $s.events.indexOf(‘purchase’) > -1)
$s.c_w(‘productnum’, ‘0’, 0);
// Automate OrderID eVar
if ($s.purchaseID)
$s.eVar21 = $s.purchaseID;
// Set Internal Campaign
if (!$s.eVar5) {
$s.eVar5 = $s.getQueryParam(‘ab’);
$s.eVar5 = $s.getValOnce($s.eVar5, ‘s_ev5’, 0);
}
// Set Campaign Variables
//TODO: Delete and write from scratch per Justice. Compare to Marketing Channels in SC Admin. Kevin Winstead at Fanatics is providing his MC logic to Justice week of 7/22.
var s_Url = window.location.href;
var s_Cpgn = parseSource(s_Url);
$s.channelManager(‘pcrid’, ‘:’, ‘c_m’, ‘0’, ‘cm_dl’, ‘1’);
if ($s._channel) {
// Correct channels based on /source/ parameter, which is in s_Cpgn
if ($s._channel == “Natural Search” && !!s_Cpgn){
$s._channel = “Paid Search”;
}
// Set Campaign Channel eVar3
if ($s._channel == “Paid Search”) {
$s.eVar3 = “ppc”;
$s.eVar6 = “Paid Search”;
}
if ($s._channel == “Natural Search”) {
$s.eVar3 = “organic search”;
}
if ($s._channel == “Other Natural Referrers”) {
$s.eVar3 = “referral”;
}
if ($s._channel == “Typed/Bookmarked”) {
$s.eVar3 = “direct”;
}
}
// Set campaign variables that won’t trigger CM
if (s_Cpgn.indexOf(’eml’) > -1) {
$s.eVar3 = “email”;
}
if (s_Cpgn.indexOf(‘callcenter’) > -1) {
$s.eVar3 = “call center”;
}
// Set s.campaign to
// Campaign Stacking
if ($s.eVar3) $s.eVar4 = $s.crossVisitParticipation($s.eVar3, ‘s_cvpcpgn’, ‘1’, ‘5’, ‘>’, ‘purchase’, 30);
//Product Finding Method Automation
if ($s.eVar6) {
//keep pre-set value
}
else if ($s.eVar3==”organic search”) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘organic search’;
}
else if ($s.campaign) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘external campaign’;
}
else if (document.referrer && !internalFlag) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘referral’;
}
else if ($s.eVar1 && $s.eVar1 != ‘non-search’) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘internal search results’;
}
else if ($s.eVar5 && $s.eVar5 != ‘non-internal campaign’) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘internal campaign’;
}
else if ($s.eVar7 && $s.eVar7 != ‘non-browse’) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘browse’;
}
else if ($s.events.indexOf(‘purchase’) > -1) {
$s.eVar6 = ‘unknown at time of purchase’;
}
//Setup Clickmap Object IDs
$s.setupDynamicObjectIDs();
// Set Partner ID Variables
if (typeof sc_PSID != ‘undefined’ && sc_PSID != ”)
$s.eVar16 = $s.prop11 = sc_PSID;
else
$s.eVar16 = $s.prop11 = window.location.hostname;
// Set Cart Created Date
if (!!$s.events && $s.events.indexOf(“scOpen”) > -1) {
var e = new Date();
$s.eVar47 = e.getMonth() + 1 + ‘/’ + e.getDate() + ‘/’ + e.getFullYear();
}
// Filter Category Stacking
if ($s.eVar23)
$s.eVar25 = $s.prop17 = $s.crossVisitParticipation($s.eVar23, ‘s_cvpva’, ‘1’, ‘5’, ‘>’, ‘purchase’, 1);
// Filter Selection Stacking
if ($s.eVar24)
$s.eVar26 = $s.prop18 = $s.crossVisitParticipation($s.eVar24, ‘s_cvpvb’, ‘1’, ‘5’, ‘>’, ‘purchase’, 1);
//Lowercase all variables
$s.manageVars(‘lowercaseVars’);
}
$s.doPlugins = s_doPlugins
/******************** CONVENIENCE FUNCTIONS *************************/
function s_setError(errorList, thePageName) {
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘pageName,prop12,prop19,prop22,prop50’;
$s.pageName = thePageName;
$s.prop12 = $s.prop19 = errorList;
$s.tl(true, ‘o’, ‘Track Error’);
}
function s_findMethod(findMethod) {
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘eVar6’;
$s.eVar6 = findMethod;
$s.tl(true, ‘o’, ‘Finding Method’);
}
function s_beginCheckout(products) {
//s_beginCheckout(‘;SKU1,;SKU2,;SKU3’)
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘eVar28,prop9,events,products’;
$s.linkTrackEvents = $s.events = ‘scCheckout’;
$s.eVar28 = ‘Checkout’;
$s.prop9 = ‘Checkout’;
$s.products = products;
$s.tl(true, ‘o’, ‘Checkout’);
}
function linkInteraction(elem,linkName) {
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘eVar28,prop9,eVar43’;
$s.eVar28 = linkName;
$s.prop9 = linkName;
if ($s.pageName) {
$s.eVar43 = $s.pageName;
}
$s.tl(elem, ‘o’, linkName, null, navigate);
return false;
}
/* Used to parse campaign code from URL */
function parseSource(pUrl) {
if (pUrl.indexOf(“/source”) > -1) {
var iEnd = pUrl.lastIndexOf(“/”) + 1;
pUrl = pUrl.substr(iEnd, pUrl.indexOf(“?”) > -1 ? pUrl.indexOf(“?”) – iEnd : pUrl.length – iEnd);
}
else pUrl = “n/a”;
return pUrl.toLowerCase();
}
/* Function to track Email sign-ups*/
function s_emailSignup(s_step, s_teams) {
if (s_step == “1”) {
$s.pageName = “email signup:choose teams”;
$s.eVar43 = “email signup:choose teams”;
$s.channel = “email signup”;
$s.prop3 = “pages”;
$s.events = “event30,event32”;
$s.t();
}
if (s_step == “2”) {
$s.pageName = “email signup:confirmation”;
$s.eVar43 = “email signup:confirmation”;
$s.channel = “email signup”;
$s.prop3 = “pages”;
$s.list1 = s_teams;
$s.events = “event30,event16”;
$s.t();
}
}
function s_haveSuggestion(productID) {
//s_haveSuggestion(‘12345’)
$s.linkTrackVars = ‘events,products’;
$s.linkTrackEvents = ‘event22’;
$s.events = ‘event22’;
if (productID)
$s.products
var s_code=”,s_objectID;function s_gi(un,pg,ss){var c=”s.version=’H.26.1′;s.an=s_an;s.logDebug=function(m){var s=this,tcf=new Function(‘var e;try{console.log(“‘+s.rep(s.rep(s.rep(m,”\”,”\”
+”\”),”n”,”\n”),”””,”\””)+’”);}catch(e){}’);tcf()};s.cls=function(x,c){var i,y=”;if(!c)c=this.an;for(i=0;i
-
Plainware System, ACLware Ambulance
Software Project Test Plan
Test: ADS – Ambulance Dispatch System
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to outline the test strategy and overall test approach for the ADS project. This includes test methodologies, traceability, resources required, and estimated schedule.
Audience
The audience of this document is the project team and the project management team. This document is also written for the extended test team. The test lead, testers, and any outsourced testers should be able to utilize this document to understand the scope of work that must be accomplished by the test team. The document is intended to accomplish its purpose only for the intended audiences.
Revision History
This section describes the objectives and extent of the tests. The goal is to provide a framework that can be used by managers and testers to plan and execute the necessary tests in a timely and cost-effective manner.
1.1 Test objectives
The objective of the test suite is to provide adequate coverage metrics, requirements validation, and system quality data such that sufficient data is provided for those making the decision to release.
1.2 Extent of tests
The tests referenced herein are written to validate use cases, requirements (both functional and non-functional), system architecture, and object design. The structured tests for object design will be run first as the components of the system are developed. The structured tests to validate the system architecture will be run next as the system is integrated in bottom-up fashion during integration test.
2. Relationship to other documents
This section explains the relationship of the test plan to the other documents produced during the development effort such as the RAD, SDD, and ODD (Object Design Document). It explains how all the tests are related to the functional and nonfunctional requirements, as well as to the system design stated in the respective documents. If necessary, this section introduces a naming scheme to establish the correspondence between requirements and tests.
2.1 Relationships to documents
Black box tests relating to use cases are developed from the use case diagram(s) in the RAD (requirements analysis document).
Black box tests derived from functional requirements are developed from the requirements lists in the RAD.
Performance tests derived from nonfunctional requirements are developed from the nonfunctional requirements in the RAD.
Structured (unit/white box) tests are generated from the OOD (Object Design Document). The specific tests are developed from the OOD component diagram of each of the components.
Integration tests are developed from the SDD (System/Architecture Design Document). The integration tests generally come from the overall package diagram describing the architecture of the system. The architecture is also used to help in determining the integration test approach.
The test environment (hardware/software) is also derived from the SDD.
A visualization of the relationships.
2.2 Test naming scheme
The names of test cases will indicate from where they have been derived using a system of prefixes. The following prefixes are use to denote the tests were derived from the following places.
uc_ tests derived from use cases
nfrs_ tests derived from nonfunctional requirements
arch_ integration tests derived from the system architecture spec
odd_ structured tests derived from the subsystem decomposition and component diagrams
e2e_ end-to-end systemic tests that exercise the entire user scenarios
If a test was derived from a particular requirement number or component design number, the test names will contain the requirement number or name after prefix followed by an underscore.
After the prefix and the number or name identifier, the test name shall contain a brief, but descriptive name.
3. System overview
This section, focusing on the structural aspects of testing, provides an overview of the system in terms of the components that are tested during the unit test. The granularity of components and their dependencies are defined in this section.
3.1 Software Architecture Overview
* Architecture Overview an excerpt from Deliverable 3: Architecture Specification
3.2 Subsystem Decomposition (Components)
* Subsystem Decomposition an excerpt from Deliverable 3: Architecture Specification
4. Features to be tested/not to be tested
This section, focusing on the functional aspects of testing, identifies all features and combinations of features to be tested. It also describes all those features that are not to be tested and the reasons for not testing them.
4.1 Features to be tested
Components developed in house
The components developed by this organization will be tested unless otherwise noted below in section 4.2.
Components developed by outsource vendors
Components outsourced to be developed specifically for this project where this test team has primary responsibility to test and validate those components will be tested.
Components outsourced to be developed specifically for this project where the outsourced vendor is responsible for development as well as testing will not be tested as components by the component testers. Rather, the test results from the vendor will be reviewed by the test leads, and if they pass review, the component will be tested in-house starting with integration test.
4.2 Items that will not be tested
3rd party and Off-The-Shelf components
It is assumed that 3rd party components were evaluated and the pros and cons properly weighed before choosing that component with our software. The interfaces to those components will be tested, but not the functionality or performance those components.
This includes any 3rd party websites and GPS devices or software.
Infrastructure components
The actual database software utilized is assumed to work as designed and will not be directly tested for functionality. Performance tests will be done during system test with respect to GUI response time that will involve the database. However, no testing will be done directly against the database.
The internet/WIFI backbone will be utilized during testing, however, no tests will be written executed to directly test the communications backbone.
5. Pass/Fail criteria
This section specifies generic pass/fail criteria for the tests covered in this plan. They are supplemented by pass/fail criteria in the test design specification. Note that “fail” in the IEEE standard terminology means “successful test” in our terminology.
5.1 Component Pass/Fail criteria
Tests executed on components only pass when they satisfy the signatures, constraints, and interfaces dictated by the Object Design Specification for that component. This includes positive tests, negative and stress tests, and boundary tests.
If a test exhibits a product failure to meet the objectives of the object design specification, it will fail and a defect/issue will be reported in the defect tracking system for review by the triage team.
5.2 Integration Pass/Fail criteria
Tests executed on integrated components only pass when they satisfy the signatures, constraints, and interfaces dictated by both the object design specification and the system architecture specification. This includes positive tests, negative and stress tests, boundary conditions, and tests that explicitly manipulate the interface environment (such as the physical connection to the database server).
If a test exhibits a product failure to meet the objectives of both the object design specification and the system architecture specification, it will fail and a defect/issue will be reported in the defect tracking system for review by the triage team.
5.3 System Pass/Fail criteria
Tests executed against the system use the functional requirements, non-functional requirements, and use cases as the oracle to determine pass or fail.
If a test exhibits a product failure to meet the objectives of any of the functional requirements, non-functional requirements, or the use cases, it will fail and a defect/issue will be reported in the defect tracking system for review by the triage team.
6. Approach
This section describes the general approach to the testing process. It discusses the reasons for the selected integration testing strategy. Different strategies are often needed to test different parts of the system.
6.1 General Test Strategy
Unit testing and component testing will be performed on the components as they are developed. Test will be executed using test code in the form of either custom test tools or as an automated suite of tests run against the components in their individual sandboxes.
Integrations tests will be performed by both the component testers as well as the system testers. The BAT and the unit test suite will be used as a regression during the integration of components. However, as the integration begins to include GUI level functionality, the tests being run will utilize significantly more manual testing and less automated testing.
System test will require a new set of tools that can measure NFRS compliance, such as LoadRunner (load testing) or FindBugs (java source code analysis for security issues). Manual tests will start by validating functionality based on the requirements. Later stages of system test will include manual end-to-end tests to validate use cases.
6.2 Integration Test Strategy
Because the components will be developed from the bottom-up and top-down, the test strategy will also align to the order of development of components. This will utilize a mostly bottom-up integration test approach, but will also involve the sandwich integration test approach.
Please review the system architecture overview and the subsystem architecture in section 3.
6.3 Test Case alignment with test phases
7. Suspension and resumption
This section specifies the criteria for suspending the testing on the test items associated with the plan. It also specifies the test activities that must be repeated when testing is resumed.
7.1 Automated Unit Test Suite
As components are being developed, unit tests will be developed to test the interfaces of the components and low-level unit tests will be developed to test the methods of the underlying classes in the components.
As a prerequisite to the BAT, the automated unit test suite will be run by the build server on a per-build basis.
When the unit-test suite reports failures, testing will not occur on that build until the failures have been analyzed and resolved. Testing will resume on a build that passes the automated unit test suite.
7.2 Build Acceptance Test (BAT)
When a build is deemed ready to test by development, a build acceptance test will be run on the build. The BAT will consist of a broad but shallow set of tests to determine the overall stability of the build and decide if it is worth testing.
If the BAT fails on a particular build, testing will suspend until another build is created with any BAT failure issues fixed, verified by running the BAT again. Testing will resume on a build that passes the BAT.
Different build acceptance tests will be developed and used for the different test phases. Component BATs will be small and localized for each of the components. Integration BATs will vary based on the level of integration testing being performed. The System Test BAT will contain a set of tests that will utilize each of the components of the system.
7.3 Regression Testing
On a build by build basis, major bug fixes or code changes will be reviewed to determine the effects they may have on the system. If the changes are deemed to cause a sufficient amount of risk, regression test sets of the appropriately judged size will be created and executed.
A system-wide regression will also be run on the release candidate build to ensure incremental changes to the system have not altered the results of the tests that were run early in the test cycle.
7.4 System Design Changes
If at any point in time issues are submitted that require a design change to the system, all testing will be suspended. After the changes to the requirements, system architecture, and object design are made, a review and updates will be performed of the test specifications to ensure they properly align with the revised system changes. After updates are made, testing will resume. Tests in the vicinity of the change must all be rerun. A 20% regression of other tests must also be performed to ensure the changes did not adversely affect other parts of the system.
8. Testing materials (hardware/software requirements)
This section identifies the resources that are needed for testing. This should include the physical characteristics of the facilities, including the hardware, software, special test tools, and other resources needed (office space, etc.) to support the tests.
8.1 Facilities required
The team will need a lab are for the test equipment. The lab area should be approximately 400 sq ft in size, with 160 sq ft of desktop space. The lab area needs multiple power outlets on each side of the room. A table in the center of the room would also allow for easy-access test team technical discussions.
8.2 Hardware required
To enable the team to testing in an optimal environment, the lab needs to contain 4 copies of the system under test. The hardware components in the system [as seen in section 3.3 of the architecture specification], in a single set are a Database Server, a WebServer, a client PC with a web browser that supports Java, and the embedded system that is used in the ambulance. The four systems allow the team to test several components in parallel.
Also, if a single system exhibits a strange bug, it can be left in that state for developer debugging and analysis, while testing continues on the other systems.
8.2 Software required
Software required in this system is minimal. The database server needs the appropriate database (MySQL) installed, setup, and configured properly.
The WebServer machine needs IIS installed the the ISS services started so that it can properly act as a WebServer machine.
The client machine needs Java 1.5.0_b12 installed and properly configured with Internet Explorer 6.0 or newer.
8.3 Special requirements
Additional tools and software may need to be purchased or otherwise acquired or reused. Such software is used to execute special tests that are best run and results recorded and analyzed by automated means. For Load testing this requires a tool like LoadRunner. For Security testing at the complied source code level this requires a tool like FindBugs.
9. Test cases
This section, the core of the test plan, lists the test cases that are used during testing. Each test case is described in detail in a separate Test Case Specification document. Each execution of these tests will be documented in a Test Incident Report document.
9.1 Test specifications derived from nonfunctional requirements
nfrs_3.3.1_usability_MouseKeyboardNavigation
nfrs_3.3.1_usability_EaseOfUnderstandabilityAndUse
nfrs_3.3.1_usability_UserManual
nfrs_3.3.2_reliability_ErrorRecovery
nfrs_3.3.3_performance_DispatchTime3Minutes
nfrs_3.3.3_performance_11MinuteException
nfrs_3.3.3_performance_PageResponseTime15seconds
nfrs_3.3.6_interface_WebBrowserSupport
9.2 Test specifications derived from the use cases in the functional requirements
10. Testing schedule
This section of the test plan covers responsibilities, staffing and training needs, risks and contingencies, and the test schedule.
10.1 Test Schedule
Test Phase Time Owner
Test Plan Creation 1 wk Test Manager
Test Specification Creation 2 wks Test Leads
Test Specification Team Review 1 wk Project Team
Component Testing 4 wks Component Testers
Integration Testing 4 wks Component & System Testers
System Testing 3 wks System Testers
Performance Testing 1 wk System Testers
Use Case Validation 2 wks System Testers
Alpha Testing 1 wk Product Managers / Analysts
Beta Testing Pilot Program 4 wks Pilot Customers
10.2 Responsibilities
The Test Manager is responsible for the overall test plan (this document) and test resources throughout the course of the project. He needs to be assigned to the project to review the requirements analysis, system architecture design, and object design of the system. From those specifications, he will generate the Test Plan. He will also generate section 9 “Test Cases” in this document. He will generate the list of test specifications and a brief description of each one in this document. He will generate and communicate the test strategy for the project to the test team and the rest of the project team as well as locate, acquire, and/or allocate the proper resources.
He will provide periodic updates to the Program Director on the progress of test execution versus the plan as well as the metrics on the quality status of the product, focusing on key issues that need immediate attention from the Project Office.
He will provide periodic updates to the Program Director on the progress of test execution versus the plan as well as the metrics on the quality status of the product, focusing on key issues that need immediate attention from the Project Office.The Test Leads are responsible for the creation of the detailed test specifications and will generate those and revise section 9 of this document as needed. The leads manage the day-to-day progress of each of their subcomponents and compile and report the metrics to the test manager. They are also responsible for ensuring the testers make adequate progress and follow the overall strategy defined by the Test Manager.
The Component Testers are responsible for the test execution on a daily basis for the component of the system to which they’ve been assigned.
They also lead the effort during most of the integration test cycle and hand off the testing to the System Testers during the last states of integration testing.
The System Testers are responsible for functional testing, performance testing, and use case validation testing during the System Test Phase of the project.
During Alpha Testing, the Product Managers / Business Analysts who wrote the requirements will test the system to determine if the system truly aligns with the original vision of the system.
During Beta Testing, a small group of specially chosen customers will pilot the product to ensure it suits their needs.
10.3 Staffing and training needs
1 Test Manager
– responsible for finding and training the following test resources
3 Test Leads
– must be trained on the process being used for this project
– must be trained on the test specification format utilized
– must be trained on the defect/issue tracking system utilized
7 Component Testers
– must know SQL and Java
– must be familiar with NetBeans and Eclipse
– must be skilled at unit testing, API testing, and integration testing
– must be trained on the process being used for this project, the test specification format utilized, and the defect/issue tracking system utilized
7 System Testers
– must know how to use Load testing & Stress testing automation tools (such as LoadRunner)
– must be experienced in system testing and use case validation testing
– must be trained on the process being used for this project.
– must be trained on the test specification format utilized
– must be trained on the defect/issue tracking system utilized
10.4 Risks and contingencies matrix
-
Novelty
Take a man who has been takin advantage of and riduculed assessible or nkt my skills is ro, but remberance of terminal
Do life shape?
And I will venture!
Add a surreal varable condition in argumentation and demanding resude. The crucial reason this is such a synopsis is because such cases predition is mental theists free will.
-
Simultaneously Advanced
Optic storage pits. Reduction, by the end of storage is heat it generates.
Handling clearly automation, Reuters and Dow Jones, both well know long before the advent of computers, now lead the market process of financials and business information. Like examples deer park in Charlotte elp the internet and wild wild west. Having learned to single word divided and making cake or “John and Mary were married yesterday.” In a particular culture – which explains cake the connotiaon – interestingly explains the culture
“Television” was reduced to “Phone”.
-
I Me, Wife, and you and I
Definition
[def-uh–nish–uh]
Specific the minimus degree of comprehensive desires. Identify the definitions which’ll will be used to judge the comprehensiveness of the relating effort and it’s not clear for example, determining which a statement gave even executed at least once.
Specify any additional completion criteria for example, definitions error frequency.
The techniques today began used to peaceable retirement the benefit specified.
-
Life on Sooth Part 4
Gameloft – means that you will milgram once tasting flow. Showing the she flowers to each cased. Each use vase will contain the flockhart of dish that you will have within each process you ascribed in the plainware.com event composition, which If you want, can separate.
xdr – The users causes for your DIDI on different part for ease of reading and clarity.
Logic echoes will.
Average itself, an external agent it and each users case’s will have one or more devices that are read from or written to in the processes implied within they’re example in doc shearing for thinking.
-
Life On Sooth Part 3
This memorial willing, take- you through the creating an eventful milgram. It is also instructive for the catalyst flow contextualized model and system, datasift flowers anagram.
An, symobleqare the symbols for all three are the same.
Here focusing where will an the event anagram.
In an accent to ecent disagree, we are only focusing on one process. In your days glow for your project, you will be programming your system’satire. The users case leveling not the process level.
Bloglog 
You must be logged in to post a comment.